Skip to main content

Explaining Our Parents' Disdain of Consumerism

 Many Baby-Boomers had parents who went through the Great Depression. They would sometimes tell anecdotes to their children that might have seemed exaggerated to the children. The children would also tend to roll their eyes when their parents displayed frugality that seemed laughably out-of-date.

I am starting to wonder if there is another reason for the parents' frugal consumer behavior. Last post I talked about how inflation will cause substitution; that is, products will use cheaper and cheaper materials. They will take every shortcut imaginable.

How much cheapening can happen before a consumer starts to dislike shopping? When every new purchase produces a disappointment, won't a consumer start to dread buying anything that isn't absolutely necessary? It is hard for older consumers not to make negative comparisons. 

Maybe there is a point where the cheapening actually starts to offend and disgust them. Products, companies, and retailers start to seem like scumbags to the older consumers. Commerce seems like a dirty, contemptible thing. The young have no basis of comparison so they just go along with things as they happen.


Comments

Anonymous said…
It happened to me years ago. Can't stand that so few companies own EVERYTHING. It does disgust me. They are scumbags. Processed food has so much in it that we don't want, so don't buy nearly as much as decades ago. Need to start fasting I guess. We've really cut back so far already on purchases. Clothes/shoe shopping is the worst! Talk about crap. Don't even get me started on pharmaceutical companies and what they have done!!!

Have a good day, though :)
Anonymous, Nothing is more gratifying than making lemonade out of lemons. And that is what you have done if you used disgust to give you the oomph to reject much of the consumerism of mainstream culture.
Anonymous mentioned shoe shopping. I am amazed how "hiking boots" cost $200, but they are nothing more than sneakers in disguise. That is not all bad, by why shouldn't they cost $75.

The whole shoe industry takes what, $5 of materials, and gives it an image, and then charges over $100.

"Technical" river sandals are even more outrageously priced: a slab of rubber with a couple nylon straps on top. Shouldn't cost more than $25.
Ed said…
I have bought, and been disappoint by, a lot of walking shoes/boots during the past 16 years since I started a 'walking' routine. The boots that I liked best were from Chippawa but they came with Vibram soles that did not last nearly as long as the Goodyear soles that I put on them when they were resoled. My advice, for what it is worth, don't get shoes/boots with Vibram soles if you want a long lasting sole.
I now have a pair of Vellies as my casual shoes and Razorback boots for my walking shoes. Both of them are made by Jim Green Footwear in South Africa and have Goodyear welt soles that have held up well so far. They can be resoled so I anticipate putting a lot of miles on them. The Vellies sell for about the same price as what are advertised as walking shoes. The Razorbacks are the same price as the Chippawas - less than $200.
Ed, Vibram soles were something good 30 years ago. If I weren't so lazy I would look up the company and probably find that they were bought out by some giant, soulless, global corporation that immediately cheapened the quality of Vibram soles but learned on how to coast on its famous name. Shoe manufacturers pay "Vibram" $10 to use their name, and then raise the price of the shoes by $30.
Anonymous said…
You still cant beat the price of a pair of good quality army boots from the military surplus store.