When was the last time you read a clay tablet? How about a papyrus scroll? It is getting to be that way with paper-and-ink books. eBooks represent genuine progress. But something more fundamental is at stake.
Regardless of the physical medium of a book, the real problem is that a book is a gigantic pile of information that is mostly useless and therefore tedious to shovel through. Books are one-directional. They are not conversational and lively.
Maybe Twitter (X) has the right idea: the written word still has value, but say what you want to say in a paragraph or two, and then shut up. Let somebody else respond.
I am being too hard to please, because on You Tube I start thinking of new complaints: why so many talking heads? Who needs video? A radio or podcast would work just as well. And why so many non-rhotic English accents?
It is ironic to be writing about this because yesterday I had the best conversation with a local in years. Perhaps it happened because I was on my best behavior. Old people should talk about the Present with younger people -- never start a sentence with, "I remember this time when..."
Both he and I never spoke more than two or three sentences before shutting up and passing the ball to the other guy. There really is no way to make a book work like that.
It is time to clean out and organize my list of photographs from recent travels. These have nothing to do with today's post:
![]() |
Southwestern Utah. Somehow I got a photo without a thousand tourists or cars. |
![]() |
Mollie's Nipple. We rode the bike up to visit good ol' Mollie. It had been a few years. |
![]() |
Differential erosion at its job, in Nevada. |
Comments
History gets down into the weeds, most of the time. Who needs 500 pages of microscopic details, names, and dates?